Concealed Carry Permits In Massachusetts Is Governed By A State Constitution
State constitutions generally govern the ability to obtain a Concealed Carry Weapons Permit, however, not all states require them. There are just a few states – like Arizona, Vermont, and Alaska – which include what’s called “constitutional carry” laws in their legal structure, and a permit is not required to carry a concealed firearm. There are other stipulations within constitutional carry, however, that demand that anyone carrying a concealed weapon identify it when in contact with any Peace Officer. Failure to do so can result in felony charges being filed. Make sure you know the laws in Massachusetts.
Do you know the laws where you live in Massachusetts, you may be able to take advantage of the streamlined application process that exists within “Shall Issue” states. The standard approval process usually includes a background check, one or more required classes, qualification with your firearm (safety and marksmanship), and paying the required fee. Currently, Utah, Nevada, and Florida are the easiest states to obtain a Shall Issue CCW.
While obtaining a Concealed Carry permit requires an application for most citizens, even when acquiring one, it doesn’t mean that it is free from restrictions. For instance, in Massachusetts you may only be allowed to carry a revolver rather than a semi-automatic pistol, or you may only be allowed to carry a specific caliber of firearm. Additionally, you may have to undergo testing for proficiency regarding weapon safety and marksmanship, and in some instances, your CCW permissions may be limited to the county or city where the permit was issued. Where proficiency testing does occur, it usually happens on either an annual or semi-annual basis.
There are three types of Concealed Carry in States, Shall Issue, May Issue, and Constitutional Carry
Although some issuers of CCWs are not as strict as others, acquiring a CCW in Massachusetts may not be an easy process. There are “Shall Issue” states and “May Issue” states, ( and Constitutional Carry which do not require any permit) and if your state happens to be a “May Issue” state, then the local authorities are generally given discretion as to whether they believe it should be issued or not. However, no matter which type of issuance your state’s laws command, you will still have to go through a lengthy application process. In most locales, this means a long application requiring extensive information, some may also require a convincing letter that provides justification for your need of a Concealed Carry permit, and possible an oral interview as well.
Find out how to obtain a CCW - CHL in every State by clicking here; concealed carry permits
The Massachusetts State Constitution states: “The people have a right to keep and bear arms for the common defense. And as, in time of peace, armies are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be maintained without the consent of the legislature, and the military power shall always be held in an exact subordination to the civil authority, and be governed by it.”
Massachusetts Law requires firearm owners to be licensed through their local Police Department or the Massachusetts State Police if no local licensing authority is available. A license is required by state law for buying firearms and ammunition. An applicant must have passed a State approved firearm safety course before applying for a license.
IN 1998, Massachusetts passed what was hailed as the toughest gun-control legislation in the country. Among other stringencies, it banned semiautomatic “assault” weapons, imposed strict new licensing rules, prohibited anyone convicted of a violent crime or drug trafficking from ever carrying or owning a gun, and enacted severe penalties for storing guns unlocked. “Today, Massachusetts leads the way in cracking down on gun violence,” said Republican Governor Paul Cellucci as he signed the bill into law. “The new gun law,” he predicted, “will certainly prevent future gun violence and countless grief.” IT DID NOT HAPPEN: “There were nearly 1.5 million active gun licenses in Massachusetts in 1998,” the AP reported. “In June of 2002, that number was down to just 200,000.” Since 1998, gun crime in Massachusetts has gotten worse, not better. In 2011, Massachusetts recorded 122 murders committed with firearms, the Globe reported this month — “a striking increase from the 65 in 1998.” Other crimes rose too. Between 1998 and 2011, robbery with firearms climbed 20.7 percent. Aggravated assaults jumped 26.7 percent.
When citizens cannot defend themselves from crime and evil because the STATE has disarmed them, this is always the end result, crime rates rise. Gun Control simply does not work! The anti-gun groups in Massachusetts will never admit they were wrong, instead they have publicly blamed the surrounding states for not having the same laws as Massachusetts, “it’s their fault because guns have no borders they have argued.”
It is amazing how supposedly educated individuals can be so narrow minded and completely oblivious to the facts that are clearly placed before them, the truth is evident to everyone EXCEPT to those with self-imposed blinders, when the facts are counter to their personal misguided agendas they simply ignore them.
To learn the real facts on gun control and gun rights, the truth, visit the home page of US Precision Defense.
Massachusetts has a national reputation as a bastion of gun control, but crimes and injuries related to firearms have risen, sometimes dramatically, since the state passed a comprehensive package of gun laws in 1998. Murders committed with firearms have increased significantly, aggravated assaults and robberies involving guns have risen, and gunshot injuries are up, according to FBI and state data.
To gun-rights groups like the National Rifle Association, these statistics are evidence that gun control does not work. But to gun-control advocates, the numbers show that no state, no matter how tough the laws, is protected from firearms violence when guns are brought in from other states.
Really, so now it’s the others states that are the issue, the anti-gun groups in Massachusetts are now blaming their surrounding states as the problem and will not admit that gun control does not work. Interestingly in the states that are pro-gun and strong supporters of the 2nd amendment do not see the need to point fingers at their surrounding states, wonder why that is? To quote truth, logic, facts, and statistics to narrow minded career politicians that are unwavering in their anti-gun agenda is pointless, its not about truth, never has been, its about their political life….its about exercising their will over the will of the people, its about power.
Massachusetts is a “may-issue” state; officials are not required to issue concealed carry permits to qualified applicants. Applicants must show justification for being allowed to carry concealed weapons, such as personal threats, being in a high-risk profession, or routinely carrying large sums of money.
Laws disarming people who have proven themselves to be a particular threat to public safety and laws that aim to disarm the public at large are precisely what turned a political argument into the American Revolution!
Massachusetts gun laws are among the most severe in the nation, requiring permission from local law enforcement officials before the purchase of any firearm; allowing local law enforcement agencies to set conditions on the possession or use of that firearm, the gun must be stored unloaded and may not be used for self-defense; and demanding all guns be registered. Massachusetts has in all reality completely disarmed its citizens and left them helpless in the face of criminals.
US Precision Defense is your ally in the fight for your gun rights and the 2nd amendment.